Photography, the Golden Mean, and Geeky Coolness
The "rule of thirds" dictates the placement of the focus of your
The rule should actually be called the "rule of the Golden Mean".
Across cultures and history, designers such as artists and architects - and even
composers and poets - have adopted the Golden Mean as a ratio that is pleasing to
the human eye. Nobody is certain why, but a rectangle with sides in the ratio of
1:1.6180339887499... just seems to please the aesthetic sense of the human
brain. Simply - it just looks good.
The ratio of height to width of the rule of thirds is 1:2/3 (or
2/3:1, depending on whether your photo is oriented down or across). This gives a
ratio of 1.5. This ratio, however, is only an approximation of the Golden Mean,
which is why the rule of thirds seems to work so well: it is building an
approximation of the Golden Mean within the boundaries of your photo.
Almost mystically, the Golden Mean seems to be a naturally
occurring number, like pi or e. The Fibonacci series of numbers starts with 0
and 1, then adds two numbers to produce the next in the series:
Now, if you take successive ratios of consecutive numbers in the
Fibonacci series, you get ratios that more and more closely approach the Golden
Mean as you use higher and higher pairs of numbers.
For this and other major number coolness, check out this Golden Mean Web
Leave space for your action:
Space implies action and stasis. The following two images are the same
photograph, cropped and sized differently:
Make sure the photos are balanced. Both the photo above and below follow the
rule of thirds, but only one is naturally balanced.
Sometimes, take that literally:
Most importantly, news photos have to tell a news story. What's going on