Photography Composition Articles
   


>Home

>Golden Mean
>General
>Color and
Image Balance

>Tools
>Forum

 



Proportions: Theorie and Construction

Golden Section or Golden Mean, Modulor, Square Root of Two

golden section or golden mean
Modulor
square root of 2
comparisons
applied proportions
golden section links
The Golden Section or Golden Mean is derived with simple geometric constructions, its ratio expressed in numbers is, however, irrational ((Square root of five) - 1) : 2 = .618034 : 1 (= 1 : 1.618034).
movie: How to Construct the Porportion of the Golden Section or Golden Mean Starting with the line that needs to be subdivided as the longer side, a rectangle of the proportion 2 : 1 (two squares) is constructed. The diagonal through the rectangle is drawn next. One of the short sides is subtracted from the diagonal by drawing an arc with that side as radius and a corner intersected by the diagonal as center. The intersection divides the diagonal into two segments. The longer of the segments is rotated onto the adjacent long side of the rectangle subdividing it so that the ratio of the shorter subdivision and the longer subdivision is the same as the ratio of the longer subdivision and the whole long side.
image: Continuous Subdivision of a Golden Section Rectangle The beauty of the golden section may be indicated by the fact that a golden section rectangle subdivides into a square and another, smaller golden section rectangle. This process can be continued ad infinitum, and similarly inversed by adding a square over the longer side of a golden section rectangle, thus establishing a proportional relationship over the entire imaginable scale of human artifacts.
In architecture the application of the golden section may afford the integration of the whole scope of a design from the site to the minutest detail. Charles Edouard Jeanneret, also known as Le Corbusier, develops two sequences of measurements ("blue" and "red" sequence) in his "Le Modulor". He takes the - assumed -average size of a human, and subdivides and expands it, closely based on the golden section relationship. In the sequel to "Le Modulor", "MODULOR 2", Corbu describes how after development of the measurements Jose Luis Sert and other modern architects, and of course, he himself, applied them in designs.

image: small image of the initial modulor person by Le Corbusier Reliefs depicting the scheme, usually in connection with an abstracted human, raising one arm to the 226 cm low ceiling, and resting the other hand on an 86 cm high desk (shown here in an early version, still hiding the lower hand), can be found on some of the buildings that Le Corbusier designed, for example on the Unité d'habitation in Berlin, and the units in Nantes-Rezé and Marseilles, France. The culmination is probably the hand - dove of peace in Chandigarh, India, turning part of the icon of the Modulor into a monument of unrelentless modernist hope for the achievement of human betterment through better architecture . . .

There is additional significance and deeper meaning to the golden section in combination of pentagons and pentagrams, I recommend reading up on that in Paul von Naredi-Rainer's "Architektur und Harmonie".

Clearly the golden section proportion is closely connected with the square, the most neutral rectangular proportion (1 : 1) imaginable. (The "Modulor" books are square!) Compared with other proportions, the golden section rectangle is relatively long. That creates a certain tension between golden section and square, which may contribute to the interest that this proportioning scheme can maintain (see Corbu's Modulor), especially when compared to schemes that use the square as only proportioning scheme (see O.M.U.).

Now, does that constitute any understandable reason to connect golden mean proportioning inseparable with beauty? Without doubt: No. Because of the non-linear nature of the golden section, as clearly demonstrated in the Modulor derivations, it is possible to find some base length and some subdivisions close enough to the ratio of the golden section in anything that may be perceived as beautiful. But that may have to do with the underlying structuring into non-equal divisions that establish scale and generate more interest because of the increased amount of detail that is generated or that is cause of the inequal divisions.
image: How To Construct the Proportion of the DIN Paper Format Another proportioning system is the ratio of (Square root of 2) : 1. The simplicity of the derivation (square root of 2 is the diagonal through a square of side length 1) is paralleled by the ease of maintaining the proportion through division or multiplication of the proportioned rectangles. The sum of two rectangles of proportion (Square root of 2) : 1 long side by long side is (Square root of 2) : 2. Divided by the square root of two we arrive at 1 : (Square root of 2), the same ratio as the two rectangles that were added together, only with a change of orientation.
image: Subdivision of a DIN Proportion Rectangle The prevalent paper formats in Germany are defined by the DIN 476 (DIN is the German Insitute for Standardization, comparable to ANSI in the U.S.A, ISO internationally, etc.). The sequence A of sizes is based on the ratio (Square root of 2) : 1. This of course means that pasting two DIN A pages together at their long sides yields the next larger DIN A formatted page. Similarly, cutting a DIN A page into halves by division of the longer side, yields two pages of the next smaller DIN A formatted page.
The advantage of sizing paper that way is self-evident, and without doubt XEROX would have preferred that kind of paper formatting over "letter" and "legal" format. (Ever wondered why for the longest time copying machines seemed to have 141% and 70% as zooming limits?)

From the Golden Section to the (Square root of 2) : 1 ratio there is clearly a reduction in variation. While the Golden Section rectangle by definition includes a square and another Golden Section rectangle, i.e. in fact two different modules, or proportioning schemes, the (Square root of 2) : 1 ratio contains only itself, therefore, is by character closer to the square. The difference here is, that the former scheme is derived by subdivision into halves, while latter is subdivided into quarters. The scale steps in the latter scheme are larger (instead of 1.414 and 0.707 it is 2.0 and 0.5), meaning it is even less flexible.

image: Common Formats / Proportions Encountered Daily A comparison of some of the most common proportions shows how little they differ. Of the proportions that are shown here, the letter format is the widest, and the golden section is the longest. 3 x 4 is the aspect ratio of the common TV, 5 x 7 is a popular photo print format, and the 35mm film format (24 x 35) is the basis for most photography.
The proportion of 3 x 4 has the additional significance that its diagonal is 5. (According to Pythagoras the sum of the squares over the kathetes equals the square over the hypotenuse, i.e. 9 + 16 = 25, with the square root of 25 being 5. qed)


(Purpose of proportioning schemes: Explanation of the perception of beauty?)




Volker Muller home page
Leave the comments,
or discuss this article in our forum.


Layout, compilation, and original ideas Copyright © 1997-1998 by Volker Müller. All other trademarks and copyrights remain property of their respective holders.
Comments about content mail to vmueller@worldnet.att.net
Published with the permission of the author. Original article can be found here: http://home.att.net/~vmueller/prop/theo.html

  








    © photoinf.com 2003-2013